A New Perspective Towards The Justice System - 1583 Words

Final Assignment Over the course of the semester I have developed a new perspective towards the justice system. Prior to taking the Juvenile Delinquency course I did not know much in detail about the negative effects of the juvenile justice system on youths. Personally, I thought the juvenile justice system was created to educate youths in order to prevent them from getting involved in more crimes and to lead them to have better outcomes in the future by giving them resources they may have not been able to attain on their own prior to their convictions. However, in reading books such as, Between Good and Ghetto by Nikki Jones, A Question of Freedom by Dwayne Betts, and Punished by Victor Rios I was able to firsthand understand through†¦show more content†¦However, depending on their charge some of these youths can be treated as adults and put into adult facilities. This is traumatic and completely unfair to me. I do not understand how the juvenile justice system is even functional. Youths ar e thrown into the system for a multitude of reasons and not always given the proper resources to prevent them from coming back in. In the first place they are not all necessarily given any resources or support to avoid the system. Most of the youths incarcerated are lower class, Black and Latino males. This population is targeted due to their skin tone, demeanor, and often time’s surroundings. Learning about all the minor factors that can lead youths into the system is what truly opened my eyes to what was truly happening in society. Youths are being labeled and criminalized time and again because of authority figures not just in the streets but in schools. This relates to the youth control complex I learned through reading Victor Rio’s book Punished. He speaks about this concept referring to the institutions that we come across by everyday like schools, our homes, and the workplace treating young people in a distinct way because they view everyday behavior as criminal activity. This shaping the misconstrued perspective that all black and Latino males are criminals. In the book A Question of Freedom by Dwayne Betts, I was able to follow the journey of a young teen that was accused of a crime and charged as an adult. He

Scarce Source Free Essays

The nursing shortage is an issue that has an increase concern in the health care system today and that has been a threat to the quality of care and safety of the patients. â€Å"The shortage of nurses is not necessarily a shortage of individuals with nursing qualifications; it is a shortage of nurses willing to work in the present condition† (Buchan Aiken, 2008, p. 3262). We will write a custom essay sample on Scarce Source or any similar topic only for you Order Now The changes in the government policies in the creation of the new measurements and compensation methods for better quality of care has increased a more critical working condition for the nursing profession. The United States will have a decline in the quality of health care and be jeopardizing the safety of the patients instead of having some positive outcomes. Nursing Shortage Influencing Factors There are five influencing factors that many of the researches have concluded: increase in the number of retiring nurses, noncompetitive salaries, nurse’s workload and role expectations, and increase opportunities outside the profession or going into administrative positions or other faculty positions. The decrease in the young people entering the nursing profession has increased the nursing shortage because is leaving the older nurses to come to their retiring year. The younger populations is also looking for a more stable profession and are going to other professions as a security blanket for their economic stability. Nurses are also faced with the dissatisfaction of having noncompetitive salaries in their nursing profession and are forced to look for a more stable opportunity outside the profession to meet their needs. Challenges and Consequences of not addressing the issue The nursing shortage must be addressed to find ways of overcoming the challenges and consequences of the issue to decrease the effects of having a negative impact on the health care system. To overcome the challenges and consequences one must look at the demand factors and supply factor in the specific countries or regions to deal with the nursing shortage. Some of the demand factors may be: â€Å"demographic and epidemiological trends, service use patterns and macroeconomic condition† (Buchan Aiken, 2008, p. 264). Some of the supply factors might be: â€Å"improving recruitment, retention and return-getting, keeping and keeping in touch with these relatively scarce nurses† (Buchan Aiken, 2008, p. 3266). The consequences of not addressing the issue of the nursing shortage will lead to an increase in the shortage, and poor health care outcomes, including a decrease in the quality of care, medical errors, patient i njury, and increase in the infection and wound rates. Solution or Innovation The policy makers need to come up with a motive or a solution that will bring the younger population to enter the nursing profession and be able to retain that population in the profession for a long time. The solution of the issue for the nursing shortage is not easy, but by increasing different types of motives and recruiting methods definitely will decrease some of the nursing shortage. Policy makers should look at â€Å"intervening with educational vouchers and incentive for nurses† (Abrahamson, PhD, RN Fox, PhD, 2009, p. 241). The method for increasing grants or educational loan forgiveness program will increase the incentive for the younger population to feel some kind of security in the nursing profession. Incentives for some of the younger nurses will include bonuses when hired, or an increase in the salary in competitive salaries, and a decrease in the workload in the profession. The government already has some of these solutions in progress, but a package of the incentives is a good idea to encourage the younger population to enter the nursing profession. Economic Investment The government is already investing in the nursing profession by the different programs starting to take place for the nursing profession, and increase the entry of the younger population into the nursing profession. By increasing the positive outcomes in the health care system the quality of care and safety of the patient will increase, and decreasing the possibility of mortality rates, infection or wound rates, medication errors or even patient injuries. For example one program is the Nursing Loan Repayment Program, which includes repaying the students loans if in agreement to practice at least two years in a health care organization. Public Efforts The older population should join in an effort to decrease in the nursing shortage by educating the young population, reinforcing the need for a better quality of care and the safety of the patient and also the importance of decreasing the nursing shortage in the health care system. The leaders of the health care system need to join and be able to develop some form of communication to promote the nursing profession, and in exchange be able to have a better health care system. Conclusion The shortage will continue to get worse if the working conditions do not improve, and the measurements for compensation do not improve in the health care system. The nursing shortage will have a positive outcome once there a good amount of adequate staffing to decrease the number of influencing factors that increase the nursing shortage. â€Å"Nurses are the main professional component of the front line staff in most health systems, and their contribution is recognized as essential to meeting developmental goals and delivering safe and effective care† (Buchan Aiken, 2008, p. 3263). How to cite Scarce Source, Papers

Argumentative Essay Gun Control free essay sample

Weapon? English 101 Argumentative/Persuasive Essay 4/12/2013 Word Count 1,255 Readability 12. 3 There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional right to bear arms; however, the new laws do not take away that right, they simply add minor restrictions in the search to put an end to gun violence. With the rise in gun violence today, we need to take some sort of action. If we look at the history of gun control in the United States, we find that laws concerning gun control are not anything new; in fact, the first federal gun control law was the National Firearms Act of 1934. This law imposed a restrictive two hundred dollar tax on the manufacture or sale of machine guns and sawed-off shotguns. Also, all sales of these weapons were to be documented in a national registry (The Long). Then in 1968, a new law passed. This was the Gun Control Act of 1968 and it was the first major gun control law in America. It prohibited certain people from being able to purchase firearms including convicted felons, fugitives, minors, individuals with a history of mental illness, dishonorable discharged veterans, expatriates and illegal aliens (Riczo). This law also expanded licensing requirements to more firearms dealers and ordered more detailed records of sales (The Long). Continuing on gun control laws throughout American history, the Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act of 1993 established background checks for gun purchasers. This law was passed to insure that no firearms would be sold to the people listed in the 1968 regulation. These background checks are required only on sales through licensed dealers, not on sales through unlicensed private sellers who do not sell firearms as a business, with the exception of certain states. Then in 1994, a ten year ban was placed on the production of nineteen listed new semi-automatic assault weapons with the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. Some of these weapons that were banned include the AR-15, some versions of the AK-47, the Uzi, the MAC-10 and the TEC-9. Along with the banning of these assault rifles, large capacity ammunition magazines were limited to ten rounds. This ban was lifted in 2004 when it expired and attempts to reinstate this law failed (The Long). Amidst these gun control laws that regulate firearm sales, there have been several laws that protect the rights of gun owners as well as gun dealers and manufacturers. The Firearm Owner’s Protection Act of 1986 was passed by Congress amid complaints that the government was abusing its power while enforcing gun control laws. This law restricts the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms from inspecting gun dealers more than once a year, unless multiple violations have been discovered. This law also prohibits the government from creating a national registry of gun ownership. In 2003, the Tiahrt Amendment was passed that forbids law enforcement from releasing information to the public as to where criminals purchased their firearms. Again in 2005, a law passed where gun manufacturers were granted immunity from civil lawsuits involving crimes with firearms; therefore, they would not be held accountable for the adverse effects of the weapons they manufacture. This law is called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (The Long). Looking at this history of gun control in the U. S. , it is not such a stretch that now, in the year 2013, we are proposing to strengthen these laws. The new proposed gun control laws include expanding background checks, banning certain assault rifles and limiting the number of rounds in gun ammunition magazines. There is also a focus on safety in schools and offering more help to the mentally ill. Also, the government is proposing tougher penalties for people who purchase guns with the intention of selling them to criminals (Remarks). The first of these new proposals is the requirement of universal background checks for anyone who wants to purchase a firearm. This will hopefully close some loopholes in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and prevent criminals and people with a history of mental illness from obtaining firearms (Remarks). As the background check system stands now, people who buy guns from gun shows and other unlicensed sellers do not have to complete a background check (Stopping). For the Columbine massacre on April 20th, 1999, the killers purchased their guns at a gun show from an unlicensed seller, so no background check was performed. On April 16th, 2007 was the shooting at Virginia Tech and this shooter obtained a gun from a licensed gun dealer which he should have been prohibited from buying. He was able to purchase this weapon because his records were never reported to the FBI’s gun background check system. Again in Tucson on January 8th, 2001, a killer acted with guns he should have been prohibited from buying because his records also were not in the database. These considerable loopholes in our current background check system need to be closed. Thirty-four Americans are murdered with guns every day and over 400,000 Americans have been killed with guns since 1968 (An Updated). When it comes to guns owned by private citizens, there are weapons that are suitable for protection and weapons that are suitable for sport. Guns such as the AR-15 assault rifle are designed for the â€Å"quick and efficient massacre of human beings. † The same applies to large capacity ammunition magazines. Why should the average citizen need this kind of weapon or magazines that can hold thirty or even one hundred rounds (Graves)? The AR-15 was used in the recent massacre in Newton, Connecticut in December 2012 and was also used in the Colorado theater shooting in July 2012 (Smith). During a recent speech this month in Colorado, President Barack Obama brought up the fact that there are â€Å"well organized† and â€Å"well financed† gun advocates that are installing fear in the public of what these new proposals mean (Jackson). Some people feel that these new laws are breaching on our constitutional right as Americans to bear arms, when in fact, the new proposed gun control laws do not prohibit law-abiding citizens  from owning firearms. They hopefully will decrease the number of weapons that fall into the hands of criminals, as well as the mentally ill, and decrease violent crime in the United States (Rampton). Obama stated that he respects the Second Amendment and that his proposals for new gun control laws do not involve gun registration or confiscation (Jackson). At the recent memorial in Co nnecticut the President let the American public know that he is willing to do everything in his power to put an end to gun violence in America. He states, â€Å"No single law, no set of laws, can eliminate evil from the world or prevent every senseless act of violence in our society. But that can’t be an excuse for inaction† (Smith). If having stricter laws regarding gun control will stop one person, ten people, or even a hundred people from committing these horrific crimes we have seen here in America, is it not worth it? Work Cited Graves, G, Earl. When Will We Stand Against the Insanity of Gun Violence? Black Enterprise. 01 Jan. 2013: 10. eLibrary. Web. 14 Apr. 2013. Jackson, David